One of my most vivid childhood memories from
Iowa’s corn country is watching clouds of monarch butterflies dance around the
milkweed patch by our back steps and finding caterpillars on the leaves. My
brother and I raised them, as many kids do. They were the first butterfly I
learned to identify, and just knowing their name made them more special.
Even as an adult, I watch eagerly for
monarchs all summer. On a recent hike with local naturalist and author John
Bates, he philosophized that “monarchs might be the next passenger
pigeon.” Indeed, their population has
been in decline since 1997 (from a high of about a billion individuals, down to
just 35 million) and a recent study warns that there is a greater than 5%
chance that they will experience “quasi- extinction” (less than 1000
individuals) within a century.
In the past, it was easy to blame our
southern neighbor for the declines. Illegal logging with mafia-like techniques in
the mountainous butterfly preserves of Mexico was a major problem, but it has
largely been addressed by the Mexican government. There is still more to be
done with supporting the local economy so that the locals won’t need to extract
resources from the protected forests, but the biggest challenge to the
monarch’s struggle for survival is no longer across an international border. It
is right here in the US, in the every-more-productive Corn Belt where I grew
up.
The incredible migration that monarchs
are beginning just now will culminate next spring in a flurry of reproduction.
The butterflies that fly south from Wisconsin and Minnesota this September will
overwinter in the remote oyamel fir tree forests in the mountains west of
Mexico City. In early spring, those same monarchs will head north again –
hoping to lay their eggs on spring-fresh milkweed plants in Texas before they
breathe their last butterfly breath.
But
what if there isn’t any milkweed? Drought, cold weather, and habitat loss have
all been recent issues. And the challenges continue as generations of monarchs
leap-frog north into the Midwest – into the infamous Corn Belt. A majority of
monarch butterflies on the Mexican wintering sites are born in the Corn Belt.
Since the first genetically modified (GMO), herbicide resistant soybeans were
introduced in 1997 (with GMO corn following shortly), there has been an 80%
decline in milkweed in the Midwest, and a concurrent 81% decline in monarchs.
In Iowa, one biologist estimates there has been a 98% reduction in milkweed on
the landscape.
“What we’re seeing here in the United States is
a very precipitous decline of monarchs that’s coincident with the adoption of [herbicide-resistant]
corn and soybeans,” says Chip Taylor, founder of Monarch Watch.
While
GMO products have garnered support among some scientists for their apparent
food safety, the changes that GMOs have caused in our farming practices and the
subsequent habitat loss for many organisms (not just monarchs) are a
significant bit of collateral damage. More GMO crops – some resistant to
several types of herbicides—are in the development pipeline.
It’s
not just GMOs and glyphosate herbicides. Farming practices have changed a lot
since my Grandpa Warren hunted pheasants among fencerows in central Iowa. With
corn prices soaring, bigger equipment, and bigger farms taking the lead, and
subsidies for ethanol taking the place of the Conservation Reserve Program
(CRP) subsidies, more of the land is under cultivation than ever before.
“Overall,
genetically modified, herbicide-resistant crops have increased the current, and
predicted future, extinction probability of monarch butterflies in eastern
North America,” agree a team of international scientists writing for the
Journal of Animal Ecology last year. They found that, while winter mortality is
still an issue to contend with, the loss of milkweed in the Corn Belt is the
greatest factor precipitating monarchs’ population declines. That same article
admonishes that addressing these challenges is “the highest conservation
priority.”
There
is some good news. Favorable weather and efforts by back-yard conservationists
like Eve Depew and Cec Peterson have helped. Chip Taylor just wrote in his most
recent Monarch Population Status blog post at MonarchWatch.org, that “The
number of eggs found …now leads me to suspect that the migration through the upper
Midwest will be better than any migration seen since 2011.” A year of
population growth will be very welcome.
Habitat
loss is the biggest problem, and you can help. Every extra back-yard milkweed
plant and un-sprayed flower garden could host one more caterpillar, and provide
nectar for hundreds of pollinators. Getting the Department of Transportation,
the Forest Service, and the National Park Service involved can offer access to even
more acres.
But
gardens like these “are not going to make up for 25.5 million acres of
additional corn and soybeans,” says Chip. Large conservation efforts – and
sustainable farming practices – also are necessary. You can help there, too, by
choosing carefully at the grocery store, by supporting the organizations doing
good work, and by letting your representatives at all levels of government know
that you value conservation efforts. Several concerned groups banded together last
year to ask that the monarch butterfly be listed as “threatened” under the
Endangered Species Act, which would increase funding and research into their
recovery.
Should
we do all of that work, and make all of those sacrifices just to save a single
species of beautiful, amazing butterfly? No! We should work to save the monarch
because in doing so we will also be saving ourselves, our planet, and the
futures of kids like Eve.